>From the review for the DT bindings for the GPU/GMU it was suggested that the phandle for the GMU be 'qcom,gmu' instead of just 'gmu'. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index c629f742a1d1..9a14cb3d5027 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev) } /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */ - node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "gmu", 0); + node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0); /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */ BUG_ON(!node); -- 2.18.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel