Comment # 10
on bug 107390
from dwagner
(In reply to Harry Wentland from comment #9) > That commit is correct. I don't think we should revert it. That said I don't > quite understand why it leads to issues. Isn't it strange that dc_link_detect goes on when edid_status==EDID_BAD_CHECKSUM but does return when edid_status==EDID_NO_RESPONSE? In both cases, one cannot expect to have read a valid EDID from the display at hand, but if it's ok to continue with an invalid EDID, why not also continue without one having been received?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
