On Friday, 27 July 2018 21:31:34 MSK Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:13:31AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > I don't follow why we need a property rather than being implied by the > > device's (the GPU) compatible string. > > There might be devices where either setup works, with or without IOMMU > translation, and the firmware can set the property depending on whether > the user wants more performance or more security. > > If we have a whitelist in the kernel this gets more complicated, we > probably need additional kernel-parameters to overwrite those whitelist > entries. Having a property in the device-tree seems to be a better way > here, imho. IIUC, device-tree should be considered to be "written in stone" for a consumer device and hence firmware property isn't something that could be easily changed. The kernel-parameter will be much more universal. Anyway the global whitelisting should be a different topic for discussion, right now we need a kind of private whitelisting that is internal to kernel. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
