On (07/19/18 10:53), Petr Mladek wrote: > Hmm, this approach is racy if there are other users > saving/setting/restoring ignore_console_lock_warning in parallel. > I mean that this works only when the entire safe/set/restore > operation is nested or sequential. Good point! However, I tend to think that we don't need to care about it that much. Having a counter to permit nesting would probably be better, but, like you said, it's unlikely that we will see any problems with ignore_console_lock_warning anyway. So we can keep it simple [IOW - the way it is]. -ss _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
