| What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|
| Status | NEEDINFO | NEW |
Comment # 6
on bug 107277
from Paul Menzel
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #3) > (In reply to Christian König from comment #2) […] > > > amdgpu_device_ip_suspend [amdgpu] (694.390 ms @ 75.000977) > > > > This is hardware teardown and rather interesting and the only point we could > > actually do something. Can you figure out what takes so long here? > > I’ll try to figure that out. I increased the maximum depth to 10, and according to the trace the loop in `gfx_v9_0_enter_rlc_safe_mode()` is the culprit. Also, in all the function is called three times. static void gfx_v9_0_enter_rlc_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev) { uint32_t rlc_setting, data; unsigned i; if (adev->gfx.rlc.in_safe_mode) return; /* if RLC is not enabled, do nothing */ rlc_setting = RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_CNTL); if (!(rlc_setting & RLC_CNTL__RLC_ENABLE_F32_MASK)) return; if (adev->cg_flags & (AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_CGCG | AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_MGCG | AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_3D_CGCG)) { data = "" data |= (1 << RLC_SAFE_MODE__MESSAGE__SHIFT); WREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_SAFE_MODE, data); /* wait for RLC_SAFE_MODE */ for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) { if (!REG_GET_FIELD(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SAFE_MODE), RLC_SAFE_MODE, CMD)) break; udelay(1); } adev->gfx.rlc.in_safe_mode = true; } }
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
