On Monday 09 July 2018 11:01 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
From: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Make the pclk_rate u64 to accommodate higher pixel clock
rates.
Changes in v4:
- fixed commit message
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
index 671039b7b75b..73587e731a23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
@@ -669,7 +669,8 @@ static int dsi_calc_clk_rate(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_dual_dsi)
const struct msm_dsi_cfg_handler *cfg_hnd = msm_host->cfg_hnd;
u8 lanes = msm_host->lanes;
u32 bpp = dsi_get_bpp(msm_host->format);
- u32 pclk_rate;
+ u64 pclk_rate;
+ u64 pclk_bpp;
Minor nit, I don't think we need to change pclk_rate to u64. A u32 can
hold up to a 2.14 Ghz pixel clock, which we're still quite far away
from in real life. u64 for pclk_bpp is right, though.
Thanks,
Archit
if (!mode) {
pr_err("%s: mode not set\n", __func__);
@@ -689,13 +690,15 @@ static int dsi_calc_clk_rate(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_dual_dsi)
if (is_dual_dsi)
pclk_rate /= 2;
+ pclk_bpp = pclk_rate * bpp;
if (lanes > 0) {
- msm_host->byte_clk_rate = (pclk_rate * bpp) / (8 * lanes);
+ do_div(pclk_bpp, (8 * lanes));
} else {
pr_err("%s: forcing mdss_dsi lanes to 1\n", __func__);
- msm_host->byte_clk_rate = (pclk_rate * bpp) / 8;
+ do_div(pclk_bpp, 8);
}
msm_host->pixel_clk_rate = pclk_rate;
+ msm_host->byte_clk_rate = pclk_bpp;
DBG("pclk=%d, bclk=%d", msm_host->pixel_clk_rate,
msm_host->byte_clk_rate);
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
