Quoting Dominique Martinet (2018-07-11 08:46:15) > This is effectively no-op as the next line writes a nul at the final > byte of the buffer, so copying one letter less does not change the > behaviour. > > Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > gcc 8 gives the following warning, which I am not sure why is treated > as error for this file, thus making me fix it: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c: In function ‘intel_tv_get_modes’: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1358:3: error: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 32 equals destination size [-Werror=stringop-truncation] > strncpy(mode_ptr->name, input->name, DRM_DISPLAY_MODE_LEN); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > > Also, as a side note, while checking if this was already sent I stumbled > uppon this: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-July/170638.html > ([Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/7] Fix truncate string in the strncpy) > which replaces strncpy(dest, src, sizeof(dest)) by strncpy(dest, src, > strlen(dest))... This isn't for linux but this looks like a pretty bad > idea to me... (I'm not on the list to reply there, sorry) > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c > index b55b5c157e38..f5614d07b10d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c > @@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ intel_tv_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) > mode_ptr = drm_mode_create(connector->dev); > if (!mode_ptr) > continue; > - strncpy(mode_ptr->name, input->name, DRM_DISPLAY_MODE_LEN); > + strncpy(mode_ptr->name, input->name, DRM_DISPLAY_MODE_LEN - 1); strlcpy -Chris _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
