Re: [PATCH 00/21] USB DisplayLink patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:14:02AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, Dave Airlie wrote:
> 
> > On 4 June 2018 at 00:40, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Here I'm sending bug fixes and performance improvements for the USB
> > > DisplayLink framebuffer and modesetting drivers for this merge window.
> > >
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > You probably want to split these up into separate series for the kms and fbdev
> > drivers.
> > 
> > Otherwise at least for drm you've missed this merge window, since it
> > closes around rc6 of the previous kernel,
> 
> Could you apply at least the fbdefio patches (without them, fbdefio is 
> unusable due to crashes) and the display corruption of the last line 
> (because most people will hit it)?
> 
> > did you use git send-email
> > for these patches, at least some of them viewed funny on my phone,
> 
> I used the command "quilt mail". I use quilt, not git, for management of 
> my patches.
> 
> > I'll try and look over the kms ones soon. Do you have any numbers for
> > improvements to the kms ones?
> > 
> > Dave.
> 
> I measured performance improvement on the framebuffer patches. The kms 
> driver already performs well, there's not much to do.
> 
> I'd like to as you if you could review the patch "udl-kms: fix a 
> linked-list corruption when using fbdefio" - for me it fixes the crashes, 
> but I am not expert in modesetting drivers and I don't know if some other 
> part of the kernel assumes that the framebuffer pages must be allocated 
> with drm_gem_get_pages.
> 
> 
> BTW. When I unplug the USB adapter while using the modesetting driver, I 
> get this warning. Do you have an idea how to fix it?

Probably the driver is missing a proper shutdown call (for atomic drivers
this would be drm_atomic_helper_shutdown), leaving the connector active,
which leaves it's reference count elevated. Or something like that.

Aside: Should we maintain uld as part of drm-misc under the small drivers
topic? Or is this patch pile here more a one-shot effort? See

https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/maintainer-tools/drm-misc.html#small-drivers

Cheers, Daniel

> 
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c:439 drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x250/0x2b8 [drm]
> Modules linked in: udlfb hid_generic usbhid hid tun bridge stp llc autofs4 binfmt_misc ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack xt_multiport iptable_filter iptable_mangle ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 xt_nat xt_tcpudp iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 ip_tables x_tables pppoe pppox af_packet ppp_generic slhc udl drm_kms_helper cfbfillrect cfbimgblt cfbcopyarea drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops fb font snd_usb_audio snd_hwdep snd_usbmidi_lib snd_rawmidi snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp nf_nat nf_conntrack sd_mod ipv6 aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher crc32_ce ghash_ce gf128mul aes_arm64 sha2_ce
>  sha256_arm64 sha1_ce xhci_plat_hcd xhci_hcd sha1_generic usbcore usb_common ahci_platform libahci_platform libahci mvpp2 unix
> CPU: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7 #1
> Hardware name: Marvell 8040 MACCHIATOBin (DT)
> Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [usbcore]
> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
> pc : drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x250/0x2b8 [drm]
> lr : drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x88/0x2b8 [drm]
> sp : ffffffc13a643920
> x29: ffffffc13a643920 x28: ffffffc13a63ac00
> x27: ffffffc1380962c0 x26: ffffffc11b95f898
> x25: ffffff8000afd1d8 x24: ffffffc11b95f800
> x23: 0000000000000060 x22: ffffff8000afd240
> x21: ffffffc11b95eb38 x20: ffffffc11b95e800
> x19: ffffffc11b95eb30 x18: ffffffc11b95ea7c
> x17: 0000007fa3591b60 x16: ffffff80081dc178
> x15: ffffffc11b95ea78 x14: 0000000000000000
> x13: ffffffc12b3fc000 x12: ffffffc12b3fc028
> x11: ffffffc12b3fc119 x10: 000000000000001f
> x9 : 0000000000000028 x8 : ffffff8000a84000
> x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000001
> x5 : 0000000000000002 x4 : 0000000000000001
> x3 : 0000000000000002 x2 : 000000000000002f
> x1 : ffffffc11b95eaf8 x0 : ffffffc11b978818
> Call trace:
>  drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x250/0x2b8 [drm]
>  udl_modeset_cleanup+0xc/0x18 [udl]
>  udl_driver_unload+0x30/0x50 [udl]
>  drm_dev_unregister+0x3c/0xe8 [drm]
>  drm_dev_unplug+0x18/0x70 [drm]
>  udl_usb_disconnect+0x30/0x40 [udl]
>  usb_unbind_interface+0x6c/0x290 [usbcore]
>  device_release_driver_internal+0x170/0x200
>  device_release_driver+0x14/0x20
>  bus_remove_device+0x118/0x128
>  device_del+0x110/0x308
>  usb_disable_device+0x8c/0x1f8 [usbcore]
>  usb_disconnect+0xb4/0x218 [usbcore]
>  usb_disconnect+0x9c/0x218 [usbcore]
>  usb_disconnect+0x9c/0x218 [usbcore]
>  hub_event+0xf20/0x1020 [usbcore]
>  process_one_work+0x1c8/0x310
>  worker_thread+0x44/0x450
>  kthread+0x118/0x120
>  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> ---[ end trace 978a27ff198f1268 ]---
> [drm:drm_mode_config_cleanup [drm]] *ERROR* connector DVI-I-1 leaked!
> 
> Mikulas
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux