Hi Heiko, Thank you for your patch, On 06/18/2018 12:28 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > From: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Allow to also drive a slave dw-mipi-dsi controller in a dual-dsi > setup. This will require additional implementation-specific > code to look up the slave instance and do specific setup. > Also will probably need code in the specific crtcs as dual-dsi > does not equal two separate dsi outputs. > > To activate, the implementation-specific code should set the slave > using dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave() before calling __dw_mipi_dsi_bind(). > > v2: > - expect real interface number of lanes > - keep links to both master and slave > > Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++-- > include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c > index bd503f000ed5..6a345d1dde25 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c > @@ -230,9 +230,20 @@ struct dw_mipi_dsi { > u32 format; > unsigned long mode_flags; > > + struct dw_mipi_dsi *master; /* dual-dsi master ptr */ > + struct dw_mipi_dsi *slave; /* dual-dsi slave ptr */ > + > const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *plat_data; > }; > > +/* > + * Check if either a link to a master or slave is present > + */ > +static inline bool dw_mipi_is_dual_mode(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi) > +{ > + return dsi->slave || dsi->master; > +} > + > /* > * The controller should generate 2 frames before > * preparing the peripheral. > @@ -273,18 +284,26 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > struct drm_bridge *bridge; > struct drm_panel *panel; > int ret; > + int lanes = device->lanes; I do not see a big interest here in adding the new var "lanes", I suggest to remove it or wait for more comments (not a strong opposition on my side:) just a preference). > > - if (device->lanes > dsi->plat_data->max_data_lanes) { > + if (lanes > dsi->plat_data->max_data_lanes) { > dev_err(dsi->dev, "the number of data lanes(%u) is too many\n", > device->lanes); please use "lanes" has you have created it ;-) or keep it as it is if you decide to remove the var lanes :) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - dsi->lanes = device->lanes; > + dsi->lanes = lanes; > dsi->channel = device->channel; > dsi->format = device->format; > dsi->mode_flags = device->mode_flags; > > + if (dsi->slave) { > + dsi->slave->lanes = dsi->lanes; > + dsi->slave->channel = dsi->channel; > + dsi->slave->format = dsi->format; > + dsi->slave->mode_flags = dsi->mode_flags; > + } > + > ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(host->dev->of_node, 1, 0, > &panel, &bridge); > if (ret) > @@ -441,10 +460,17 @@ static ssize_t dw_mipi_dsi_host_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > } > > dw_mipi_message_config(dsi, msg); > + if (dsi->slave) > + dw_mipi_message_config(dsi->slave, msg); > > ret = dw_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, &packet); > if (ret) > return ret; > + if (dsi->slave) { > + ret = dw_mipi_dsi_write(dsi->slave, &packet); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > > if (msg->rx_buf && msg->rx_len) { > ret = dw_mipi_dsi_read(dsi, msg); > @@ -583,7 +609,15 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, > * DSI_VNPCR.NPSIZE... especially because this driver supports > * non-burst video modes, see dw_mipi_dsi_video_mode_config()... > */ > - dsi_write(dsi, DSI_VID_PKT_SIZE, VID_PKT_SIZE(mode->hdisplay)); > + > + int pkt_size; I do not see any interest in adding this pkt_size, you can directly do the dsi_write (below) and remove minimum 4 lines in your patch then ... just my opinion : ) > + > + if (dw_mipi_is_dual_mode(dsi)) > + pkt_size = VID_PKT_SIZE(mode->hdisplay / 2); > + else > + pkt_size = VID_PKT_SIZE(mode->hdisplay); > + > + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_VID_PKT_SIZE, pkt_size); > } > > static void dw_mipi_dsi_command_mode_config(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi) > @@ -756,23 +790,39 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge) > dsi->panel_bridge->funcs->post_disable(dsi->panel_bridge); > > dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi); Maybe you should move dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi) call after the if (dsi->slave)... > + if (dsi->slave) { > + dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi->slave); > + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->slave->pclk); > + pm_runtime_put(dsi->slave->dev); > + } > + > clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pclk); > pm_runtime_put(dsi->dev); > } > > -static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > - struct drm_display_mode *mode, > - struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > +static unsigned int dw_mipi_dsi_get_lanes(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi) > +{ > + if (dsi->master) > + return dsi->master->lanes + dsi->lanes; > + > + if (dsi->slave) > + return dsi->lanes + dsi->slave->lanes; maybe a short explanation for master, slave and single-dsi 3 cases could be nice here > + > + return dsi->lanes; > +} > + > +static void dw_mipi_dsi_mode_set(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, > + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > { > - struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > const struct dw_mipi_dsi_phy_ops *phy_ops = dsi->plat_data->phy_ops; > void *priv_data = dsi->plat_data->priv_data; > int ret; > + u32 lanes = dw_mipi_dsi_get_lanes(dsi); > > clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk); > > ret = phy_ops->get_lane_mbps(priv_data, adjusted_mode, dsi->mode_flags, > - dsi->lanes, dsi->format, &dsi->lane_mbps); > + lanes, dsi->format, &dsi->lane_mbps); > if (ret) > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Phy get_lane_mbps() failed\n"); > > @@ -804,12 +854,25 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, 0); > } > > +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > + struct drm_display_mode *mode, > + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > +{ > + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > + > + dw_mipi_dsi_mode_set(dsi, adjusted_mode); > + if (dsi->slave) > + dw_mipi_dsi_mode_set(dsi->slave, adjusted_mode); > +} > + > static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge) > { > struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > > /* Switch to video mode for panel-bridge enable & panel enable */ > dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO); > + if (dsi->slave) > + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi->slave, MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO); > } > > static enum drm_mode_status > @@ -949,6 +1012,20 @@ static void __dw_mipi_dsi_remove(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi) > pm_runtime_disable(dsi->dev); > } > > +void dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct dw_mipi_dsi *slave) > +{ > + /* introduce controllers to each other */ > + dsi->slave = slave; > + dsi->slave->master = dsi; > + > + /* migrate settings for already attached displays */ > + dsi->slave->lanes = dsi->lanes; > + dsi->slave->channel = dsi->channel; > + dsi->slave->format = dsi->format; > + dsi->slave->mode_flags = dsi->mode_flags; I though it has been done earlier in dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach() function? > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave); > + > /* > * Probe/remove API, used from platforms based on the DRM bridge API. > */ > diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h > index 6d7f8eb5d9f2..5fd997cdf281 100644 > --- a/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h > +++ b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h > @@ -37,5 +37,6 @@ struct dw_mipi_dsi *dw_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > void dw_mipi_dsi_remove(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi); > int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct drm_encoder *encoder); > void dw_mipi_dsi_unbind(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi); > +void dw_mipi_dsi_set_slave(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, struct dw_mipi_dsi *slave); Tested-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@xxxxxx> (only on stm32 with single dsi so dual-dsi has not been tested) I wait for more comments & (minor) updates before giving my reviewed-by but you are close to have it : ) many thanks, Philippe :-) > > #endif /* __DW_MIPI_DSI__ */ > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel