Comment # 2
on bug 107012
from Simon McVittie
(In reply to Simon McVittie from comment #1) > Shouldn't this be a signed char, to make the size of the struct the same on > all architectures? I should have said: to make the size of this field the same as it used to be, and make the effective type on all architectures the same as it always was on x86. (char with no signedness qualifier is the same as signed char on most architectures, but is the same as unsigned char on at least the powerpc family.)
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
