Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Pass ODT and auto power down parameters to TF-A.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Enric

2018-06-16 19:15 GMT+09:00 Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> I'll send a new version soon, just wanted to ask some questions here. See below.
>
> Missatge de Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> del dia dt., 15 de
> maig 2018 a les 0:21:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018년 05월 15일 06:16, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> > Trusted Firmware-A (TF-A) for rk3399 implements a SiP call to get the
>> > on-die termination (ODT) and auto power down parameters from kernel,
>> > this patch adds the functionality to do this. Also, if DDR clock
>> > frequency is lower than the on-die termination (ODT) disable frequency
>> > this driver should disable the DDR ODT.
>>
>> I have a question.
>> 'disable frequency' is the same meaning of 'disable the DDR ODT'?
>>
>
> Yes, the DT defines an odt_dis_freq parameter, when the DDR frequency
> is less than the value in this parameter we disable the ODT on the
> DRAM.
>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c        | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> >  include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h |  1 +
>> >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>> > index d5c03e5abe13..cc1bbca3fb15 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>> > @@ -18,14 +18,17 @@
>> >  #include <linux/devfreq.h>
>> >  #include <linux/devfreq-event.h>
>> >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> >  #include <linux/module.h>
>> >  #include <linux/of.h>
>> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> >  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
>> >  #include <linux/suspend.h>
>> >
>> > +#include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
>> >  #include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h>
>> >
>> >  struct dram_timing {
>> > @@ -69,8 +72,11 @@ struct rk3399_dmcfreq {
>> >       struct mutex lock;
>> >       struct dram_timing timing;
>> >       struct regulator *vdd_center;
>> > +     struct regmap *regmap_pmu;
>> >       unsigned long rate, target_rate;
>> >       unsigned long volt, target_volt;
>> > +     unsigned int odt_dis_freq;
>> > +     int odt_pd_arg0, odt_pd_arg1;
>> >  };
>> >
>> >  static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
>> > @@ -80,6 +86,8 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
>> >       struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>> >       unsigned long old_clk_rate = dmcfreq->rate;
>> >       unsigned long target_volt, target_rate;
>> > +     struct arm_smccc_res res;
>> > +     int dram_flag;
>> >       int err;
>> >
>> >       opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
>> > @@ -95,6 +103,15 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
>> >
>> >       mutex_lock(&dmcfreq->lock);
>> >
>> > +     dram_flag = 0;
>>
>> Also, if dram_flag is 0, it mean that disable ODT frequency?
>
> Yes, not a good name, maybe I should just rename it to odt_enable to
> be more clear.
>
>> If it's right, you better to define the precise variables as following
>> instead of just integer(0 or 1).
>> For example,
>> - ROCKCHIP_SIP_DRAM_FREQ_ENABLE
>> - ROCKCHIP_SIP_DRAM_FREQ_DISABLE
>>
>> > +     if (target_rate >= dmcfreq->odt_dis_freq)
>> > +             dram_flag = 1;
>> > +
>> > +     arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_DRAM_FREQ, dmcfreq->odt_pd_arg0,
>> > +                   dmcfreq->odt_pd_arg1,
>> > +                   ROCKCHIP_SIP_CONFIG_DRAM_SET_ODT_PD,
>> > +                   dram_flag, 0, 0, 0, &res);
>> > +
>>
>> This operation is special for only rk3399_dmc. It is difficult
>> to understand what to do. I recommend you better to add the detailed comment
>> with code.
>
> Will do.
>
>>
>> >       /*
>> >        * If frequency scaling from low to high, adjust voltage first.
>> >        * If frequency scaling from high to low, adjust frequency first.
>> > @@ -294,11 +311,13 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >  {
>> >       struct arm_smccc_res res;
>> >       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> > -     struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> > +     struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
>> >       struct rk3399_dmcfreq *data;
>> >       int ret, index, size;
>> >       uint32_t *timing;
>> >       struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>> > +     u32 ddr_type;
>> > +     u32 val;
>> >
>> >       data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct rk3399_dmcfreq), GFP_KERNEL);
>> >       if (!data)
>> > @@ -334,6 +353,29 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >               return ret;
>> >       }
>> >
>> > +     /* Try to find the optional reference to the pmu syscon */
>> > +     node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rockchip,pmu", 0);
>> > +     if (node) {
>> > +             data->regmap_pmu = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
>> > +             if (IS_ERR(data->regmap_pmu))
>> > +                     return PTR_ERR(data->regmap_pmu);
>> > +     }
>> > +
>> > +     /* Get DDR type */
>> > +     regmap_read(data->regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
>> > +     ddr_type = (val >> RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_SHIFT) &
>> > +                 RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_MASK;
>> > +
>> > +     /* Get the odt_dis_freq parameter in function of the DDR type */
>> > +     if (ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_DDR3)
>> > +             data->odt_dis_freq = data->timing.ddr3_odt_dis_freq;
>> > +     else if (ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3)
>> > +             data->odt_dis_freq = data->timing.lpddr3_odt_dis_freq;
>> > +     else if (ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4)
>> > +             data->odt_dis_freq = data->timing.lpddr4_odt_dis_freq;
>> > +     else
>> > +             return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>>
>> how about using 'switch' statement?
>>
>
> Ok
>
>> >       /*
>> >        * Get dram timing and pass it to arm trust firmware,
>> >        * the dram drvier in arm trust firmware will get these
>> > @@ -358,6 +400,12 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >                     ROCKCHIP_SIP_CONFIG_DRAM_INIT,
>> >                     0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
>> >
>> > +     data->odt_pd_arg0 = (data->timing.sr_idle & 0xff) |
>> > +                         ((data->timing.sr_mc_gate_idle & 0xff) << 8) |
>> > +                         ((data->timing.standby_idle & 0xffff) << 16);
>> > +     data->odt_pd_arg1 = (data->timing.pd_idle & 0xfff) |
>> > +                         ((data->timing.srpd_lite_idle & 0xfff) << 16);
>> > +
>>
>> odt_pd_arg0 and odt_pd_arg1 might be used for disabling/enabling the ODT frequency.
>> As I commented, it depend on only rk3399_dmc. You better to add detailed comment.
>>
>
> Ok
>
>> And I prefer to define the XXX_SHIFT/XXX_MASK definition instead of
>> using 8/16/0xff/0xffff for the readability.
>>
>
> I tried to add the XXX_SHIFT/XXX_MASK definitions and IMHO the
> readability is worst if I use a maximum line length of 80 characters.
> These masks are only used here, let me try to convince you by adding a
> good doc in the next version and if you still prefer I add the
> definition I'll do.

If you add the some description and it would be only used on here,
I don't force to add some definition such as _SHIFT, _MASK as you suggested.

>
>> >       /*
>> >        * We add a devfreq driver to our parent since it has a device tree node
>> >        * with operating points.
>> > diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h
>> > index 7e28092c4d3d..ad9482c56797 100644
>> > --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h
>> > +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h
>> > @@ -23,5 +23,6 @@
>> >  #define ROCKCHIP_SIP_CONFIG_DRAM_GET_RATE    0x05
>> >  #define ROCKCHIP_SIP_CONFIG_DRAM_CLR_IRQ     0x06
>> >  #define ROCKCHIP_SIP_CONFIG_DRAM_SET_PARAM   0x07
>> > +#define ROCKCHIP_SIP_CONFIG_DRAM_SET_ODT_PD  0x08
>> >
>> >  #endif
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>> Samsung Electronics
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
> Cheers,
>  Enric



-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux