On 06/14/2018 01:03 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/13/2018 05:04 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 06/13/2018 06:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/12/2018 09:42 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
int gntdev_dmabuf_imp_release(struct gntdev_dmabuf_priv *priv, u32
fd)
{
- return -EINVAL;
+ struct gntdev_dmabuf *gntdev_dmabuf;
+ struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
+ struct dma_buf *dma_buf;
+
+ gntdev_dmabuf = dmabuf_imp_find_unlink(priv, fd);
+ if (IS_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf))
+ return PTR_ERR(gntdev_dmabuf);
+
+ pr_debug("Releasing DMA buffer with fd %d\n", fd);
+
+ attach = gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.attach;
+
+ if (gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.sgt)
+ dma_buf_unmap_attachment(attach, gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.sgt,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_buf = attach->dmabuf;
+ dma_buf_detach(attach->dmabuf, attach);
+ dma_buf_put(dma_buf);
+
+ dmabuf_imp_end_foreign_access(gntdev_dmabuf->u.imp.refs,
+ gntdev_dmabuf->nr_pages);
Should you first end foreign access, before doing anything?
I am rolling back in reverse order here, so I think we first need
to finish local activities with the buffer and then end foreign
access.
Looking at gntdev_dmabuf_imp_to_refs(), the order is
dmabuf_imp_alloc_storage()
dma_buf_attach()
dma_buf_map_attachment()
dmabuf_imp_grant_foreign_access()
Or was I looking at wrong place?
Agree, will move as you suggest
-boris
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
