Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/sun4i: Handle DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_*EDGE"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

sorry for my ignorance.
I don't know the right patch workflow in the case of "revert commit".
When I fix this bug, should I have to re-submit the previous patch entire plus bug-fix?
Or do I have to submit patch with bug-fix only?

Thanks in advance to everybody

--
Giulio Benetti
CTO

MICRONOVA SRL
Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD)
Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346
Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285
Capitale Sociale € 26.000 i.v.
Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285
Numero R.E.A. 258642

Il 13/06/2018 10:16, Paul Kocialkowski ha scritto:
This reverts commit 2c17a4368aad2b88b68e4390c819e226cf320f70.

The offending commit triggers a run-time fault when accessing the panel
element of the sun4i_tcon structure when no such panel is attached.

It was apparently assumed in said commit that a panel is always used with
the TCON. Although it is often the case, this is not always true.
For instance a bridge might be used instead of a panel.

This issue was discovered using an A13-OLinuXino, that uses the TCON
in RGB mode for a simple DAC-based VGA bridge.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 25 -------------------------
  1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
index c3d92d537240..8045871335b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
  #include <drm/drm_encoder.h>
  #include <drm/drm_modes.h>
  #include <drm/drm_of.h>
-#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
#include <uapi/drm/drm_mode.h> @@ -350,9 +349,6 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_lvds(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
  static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
  				     const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
  {
-	struct drm_panel *panel = tcon->panel;
-	struct drm_connector *connector = panel->connector;
-	struct drm_display_info display_info = connector->display_info;
  	unsigned int bp, hsync, vsync;
  	u8 clk_delay;
  	u32 val = 0;
@@ -410,27 +406,6 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
  	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC)
  		val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_VSYNC_POSITIVE;
- /*
-	 * On A20 and similar SoCs, the only way to achieve Positive Edge
-	 * (Rising Edge), is setting dclk clock phase to 2/3(240°).
-	 * By default TCON works in Negative Edge(Falling Edge),
-	 * this is why phase is set to 0 in that case.
-	 * Unfortunately there's no way to logically invert dclk through
-	 * IO_POL register.
-	 * The only acceptable way to work, triple checked with scope,
-	 * is using clock phase set to 0° for Negative Edge and set to 240°
-	 * for Positive Edge.
-	 * On A33 and similar SoCs there would be a 90° phase option,
-	 * but it divides also dclk by 2.
-	 * Following code is a way to avoid quirks all around TCON
-	 * and DOTCLOCK drivers.
-	 */
-	if (display_info.bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE)
-		clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 240);
-
-	if (display_info.bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE)
-		clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 0);
-
  	regmap_update_bits(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG,
  			   SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_HSYNC_POSITIVE | SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_VSYNC_POSITIVE,
  			   val);


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux