On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 06:23:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:15:10PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> Allwinner A64 has display engine pipeline like other Allwinner SOC's A83T/H3/H5. > >> > >> A64 behaviour similar to Allwinner A83T where > >> Mixer0 => TCON0 => LVDS/RGB/MIPI-DSI > >> Mixer1 => TCON1 => HDMI > >> as per Display System Block DiagramAllwinner_A64_User_Manual_V1.1.pdf > >> > >> This is second patch-set followed with previous RFC[1] and first series[2] > >> and merely concentrated on HDMI pipeline through TCON1 and rest will add eventually. > >> > >> This series fixed previous version comments > >> - about documenting fallback compatibles > >> - adding new compatible for mixer1 > >> - support for multiple DW HDMI PHY clock parents (thanks, to Jernej) > >> > >> Note: > >> Pine64 boards are unable to get edid by default like other A64 boards, > >> but forcing 'video=HDMI-A-1:1920x1080@60D' kernel command line can > >> create edid with display on penel. > > > > There's no point in trying to push this without the SRAM issue being > > solved. It is required, and won't be merged unless this is addressed. > > is SRAM issue resolved? if so may be I will try to test it on top. I'd expect the one working on this to push a solution to solve this. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel