Hi Lucas, On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 12:29:21 EEST Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 20.05.2018, 14:05 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam: > > > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx> > > > > Adopt the SPDX license identifier headers to ease license compliance > > management. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 7 +------ > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c index ec8d000..3bc62d5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c > > @@ -1,15 +1,10 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > The GPL-2.0+ tag is deprecated, please use GPL-2.0-or-later instead. > > Same comment applies to some other SPDX conversion patches from you. Documentation/process/license-rules.rst still mentions GPL-2.0+, not GPL-2.0- or-later. Until the documentation gets updated, I think we should stick to GPL-2.0+. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
