Hi Rob, On 30 March 2018 at 15:11, Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them > there rather than in our own subclass. As this makes the framebuffer > create_handle function the same as the GEM framebuffer helper, we > can reuse that. I didn't get to removing msm_framebuffer completely, because the cleanup was a bit too painful. It still seems like a useful cleanup though - could you please take a look? Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
