Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/40] misc/mei/hdcp: Store the HDCP Pairing info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wednesday 09 May 2018 03:58 PM, Shankar, Uma wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ramalingam C
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 7:27 PM
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx; chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>;
Usyskin, Alexander <alexander.usyskin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/40] misc/mei/hdcp: Store the HDCP Pairing info

Provides Pairing info to ME to store.

Pairing is a process to fast track the subsequent authentication with the same
HDCP sink.

On Success, received HDCP pairing info is stored in non-volatile memory of ME.

v2:
  Rebased.
v3:
  cldev is passed as first parameter [Tomas]
  Redundant comments and cast are removed [Tomas]

Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c | 61
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mei_hdcp.h         | 10 +++++++
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
b/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
index fa548310de7a..60afdd0cee79 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hdcp/mei_hdcp.c
@@ -244,6 +244,67 @@ int mei_verify_hprime(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
struct mei_hdcp_data *data,  }  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mei_verify_hprime);

+/**
Drop the extra *, unless you really love it :)
ha ha. Actually I have added intentionally. But removing them across all patches
as per your suggestions. :)

+ * mei_store_pairing_info:
+ *	Function to store pairing info received from panel
+ *
+ * @cldev		: Pointer for mei client device
+ * @data		: Intel HW specific Data
+ * @pairing_info	: Pointer for AKE_Send_Pairing_Info
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on Success, <0 on Failure
+ */
+
+int mei_store_pairing_info(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
+			   struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
+			   struct hdcp2_ake_send_pairing_info *pairing_info) {
+	struct wired_cmd_ake_send_pairing_info_in pairing_info_in = { { 0 } };
+	struct wired_cmd_ake_send_pairing_info_out pairing_info_out = { { 0 } };
+	struct device *dev;
+	ssize_t byte;
+
+	if (!data || !pairing_info)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dev = &cldev->dev;
+
+	pairing_info_in.header.api_version = HDCP_API_VERSION;
+	pairing_info_in.header.command_id =
WIRED_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO;
+	pairing_info_in.header.status = ME_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
+	pairing_info_in.header.buffer_len =
+
	WIRED_CMD_BUF_LEN_SEND_PAIRING_INFO_IN;
+
+	pairing_info_in.port.integrated_port_type = data->port_type;
+	pairing_info_in.port.physical_port = data->port;
+
+	memcpy(pairing_info_in.e_kh_km, pairing_info->e_kh_km,
Validate pairing_info->e_kh_km for NULL.
As we discussed we need not check for null here.

+	       sizeof(pairing_info_in.e_kh_km));
+
+	byte = mei_cldev_send(cldev, (u8 *)&pairing_info_in,
+			      sizeof(pairing_info_in));
+	if (byte < 0) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "mei_cldev_send failed. %d\n", (int)byte);
+		return byte;
+	}
+
+	byte = mei_cldev_recv(cldev, (u8 *)&pairing_info_out,
+			      sizeof(pairing_info_out));
+	if (byte < 0) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "mei_cldev_recv failed. %d\n", (int)byte);
+		return byte;
+	}
+
+	if (pairing_info_out.header.status != ME_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "ME cmd 0x%08X failed. Status: 0x%X\n",
+			WIRED_AKE_SEND_PAIRING_INFO,
+			pairing_info_out.header.status);
+		return -1;
+	}
Leave a blank line here.
sure. I will do it in all patches. Thanks.

--Ram

+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mei_store_pairing_info);
+
void mei_cldev_state_notify_clients(struct mei_cl_device *cldev, bool enabled)  {
	if (enabled)
diff --git a/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h b/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h index
00bfde251ba4..be16e49d8018 100644
--- a/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h
+++ b/include/linux/mei_hdcp.h
@@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ mei_verify_receiver_cert_prepare_km(struct
mei_cl_device *cldev,
				    size_t *msg_sz);
int mei_verify_hprime(struct mei_cl_device *cldev, struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
		      struct hdcp2_ake_send_hprime *rx_hprime);
+int mei_store_pairing_info(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
+			   struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
+			   struct hdcp2_ake_send_pairing_info *pairing_info);
#else
static int mei_cldev_register_notify(struct notifier_block *nb)  { @@ -150,5
+153,12 @@ int mei_verify_hprime(struct mei_cl_device *cldev, struct
mei_hdcp_data *data,  {
	return -ENODEV;
}
+static inline
+int mei_store_pairing_info(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
+			   struct mei_hdcp_data *data,
+			   struct hdcp2_ake_send_pairing_info *pairing_info) {
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
#endif /* defined (CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP) */  #endif /* defined
(_LINUX_MEI_HDCP_H) */
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux