Hi and thanks for the review! Le vendredi 11 mai 2018 à 16:36 +0200, Maxime Ripard a écrit : > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 12:04:13AM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-ainol-aw1.dts > > @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@ > > +/* > > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > > This really should be the first line, and with a C++ style comment, as > in: > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > /* > * Copyright (C) ... > > See Documentation/process/license-rules.rst Okay, will do in v5. > > + backlight: backlight { > > + compatible = "pwm-backlight"; > > + pwms = <&pwm 0 50000 PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED>; > > + brightness-levels = < 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 > > + 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 > > + 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 > > + 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 > > + 10 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 > > + 14 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 > > + 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 > > + 21 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 > > + 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 > > + 28 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 > > + 33 33 34 35 35 36 36 37 > > + 38 38 39 39 40 41 41 42 > > + 43 43 44 44 45 46 47 47 > > + 48 49 49 50 51 51 52 53 > > + 54 54 55 56 57 57 58 59 > > + 60 61 61 62 63 64 65 65 > > + 66 67 68 69 70 71 71 72 > > + 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 > > + 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 > > + 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 > > + 97 98 99 101 102 103 104 105 > > + 106 108 109 110 111 112 114 115 > > + 116 117 119 120 121 123 124 125 > > + 127 128 129 131 132 133 135 136 > > + 138 139 141 142 144 145 147 148 > > + 150 151 153 154 156 157 159 161 > > + 162 164 166 167 169 171 173 174 > > + 176 178 180 181 183 185 187 189 > > + 191 192 194 196 198 200 202 204 > > + 206 208 210 212 214 216 219 221 > > + 223 225 227 229 232 234 236 238 > > + 241 242 244 246 248 250 253 255>; > > You kind of overdid it here :) > > What I meant to say before was that if you have 10 elements (and you > really should have something in that magnitude) each step should > increase the perceived brightness by 10%. Mhh I think 10 elements would fall too short to really depict the curve with appropriate precision. Given the usual size for brightness cursors in e.g. gnome-shell, it feels like a bigger number would be more appropriate. Let's make it to 100 with values from 0 to 255! > In this particular case, I really think having something close to <0 4 > 8 16 32 64 128 255> would be enough. > > And in general, that kind of odd looking table without any more > context is just screaming for a comment :) Noted, I will explain the idea, but probably without the exact formula that's really a nasty hack written down on a piece of paper sitting in my garbage at this point. -- Developer of free digital technology and hardware support. Website: https://www.paulk.fr/ Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/ Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel