On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 02:59:45PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 04.05.2018 15:52, Peter Rosin wrote: > > If the bridge supplier is unbound, this will bring the bridge consumer > > down along with the bridge. Thus, there will no longer linger any > > dangling pointers from the bridge consumer (the drm_device) to some > > non-existent bridge supplier. > > I understand rationales behind this patch, but it is another step into > making drm_dev one big driver with subcomponents, where drm will work > only if every subcomponent is working/loaded. Do we need to go this way? > In case of many platforms such approach results in display turned on > very late on boot for example due to late initialization of some > regulator exposed by some i2c device, which is used by hdmi bridge. And > this hdmi bridge is just to provide alternative(rarely used) display > path, the main display path would work anyway. > > So the main question to drm maintainers is about evolution of bridges, > if drm_bridges should become mandatory components of drm device or they > could be added/removed dynamically? This is already the case. You currently cannot hotplug a drm_bridge, everything must be present. I don't think it makes sense to change that until we have physically hotpluggable drm_bridges in real hardware. I definitely don't want to refcount stuff to work around driver load bonghits on DT platforms, because refcounting is way too hard to get right :-) Afaik there's out-of-tree patches to solve 99% of the driver load fun on DT platforms, but because it's not a 100% solution it's blocked since forever. -Daniel > > Regards > Andrzej > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > > index 78d186b6831b..0259f0a3ff27 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #include <linux/mutex.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_bridge.h> > > +#include <drm/drm_device.h> > > #include <drm/drm_encoder.h> > > > > #include "drm_crtc_internal.h" > > @@ -127,12 +128,25 @@ int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_bridge *bridge, > > if (bridge->dev) > > return -EBUSY; > > > > + if (encoder->dev->dev != bridge->odev) { > > + bridge->link = device_link_add(encoder->dev->dev, > > + bridge->odev, 0); > > + if (!bridge->link) { > > + dev_err(bridge->odev, "failed to link bridge to %s\n", > > + dev_name(encoder->dev->dev)); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + } > > + > > bridge->dev = encoder->dev; > > bridge->encoder = encoder; > > > > if (bridge->funcs->attach) { > > ret = bridge->funcs->attach(bridge); > > if (ret < 0) { > > + if (bridge->link) > > + device_link_del(bridge->link); > > + bridge->link = NULL; > > bridge->dev = NULL; > > bridge->encoder = NULL; > > return ret; > > @@ -159,6 +173,10 @@ void drm_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge) > > if (bridge->funcs->detach) > > bridge->funcs->detach(bridge); > > > > + if (bridge->link) > > + device_link_del(bridge->link); > > + bridge->link = NULL; > > + > > bridge->dev = NULL; > > } > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > > index b656e505d11e..804189c63a4c 100644 > > --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > > @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ struct drm_bridge_timings { > > * @list: to keep track of all added bridges > > * @timings: the timing specification for the bridge, if any (may > > * be NULL) > > + * @link: drm consumer <-> bridge supplier > > * @funcs: control functions > > * @driver_private: pointer to the bridge driver's internal context > > */ > > @@ -271,6 +272,7 @@ struct drm_bridge { > > struct drm_bridge *next; > > struct list_head list; > > const struct drm_bridge_timings *timings; > > + struct device_link *link; > > > > const struct drm_bridge_funcs *funcs; > > void *driver_private; > > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel