This looks good, although I want to do a quick test to verify that it
doesn't break anything.
I'll get back as soon as possible.
/Thomas
On 12/21/2011 11:18 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
Commit e133e737 didn't correctly fix the integer overflow issue.
- unsigned int required_size;
+ u64 required_size;
...
required_size = mode_cmd->pitch * mode_cmd->height;
- if (unlikely(required_size> dev_priv->vram_size)) {
+ if (unlikely(required_size> (u64) dev_priv->vram_size)) {
Note that both pitch and height are u32. Their product is still u32 and
would overflow before being assigned to required_size. A correct way is
to convert pitch and height to u64 before the multiplication.
required_size = (u64)mode_cmd->pitch * (u64)mode_cmd->height;
This patch calls the existing vmw_kms_validate_mode_vram() for
validation.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang<xi.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
index 8aa1dbb..f94b33a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,6 @@ static struct drm_framebuffer *vmw_kms_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev,
struct vmw_surface *surface = NULL;
struct vmw_dma_buffer *bo = NULL;
struct ttm_base_object *user_obj;
- u64 required_size;
int ret;
/**
@@ -1102,8 +1101,9 @@ static struct drm_framebuffer *vmw_kms_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev,
* requested framebuffer.
*/
- required_size = mode_cmd->pitch * mode_cmd->height;
- if (unlikely(required_size> (u64) dev_priv->vram_size)) {
+ if (!vmw_kms_validate_mode_vram(dev_priv,
+ mode_cmd->pitch,
+ mode_cmd->height)) {
DRM_ERROR("VRAM size is too small for requested mode.\n");
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
