Re: [PATCH] drm/edid: Try harder to fix up broken headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 12/7/11 6:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > There's no reason to force the first byte to be correct if we're already
> > scoring how correct the header is.
> 
> Don't use this.  The 00 check is needed to make sure we only attempt the 
> header fixup on the zeroth block (not extensions).
That's also not sufficient however, I have a Fedora bug where it's the
first EDID byte that's busted, fixing that made the checksum correct
also.

Ben.
> 
> - ajax
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux