On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 01.05.2018 um 15:24 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> >> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> >> >> The result was printing the warning only when we were explicitly asked >> not to. >> >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Fixes: 0176adb004065d6815a8e67946752df4cd947c5b "swiotlb: refactor >> coherent buffer allocation" >> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> > > > Good catch, looked at the code multiple times and haven't seen that myself > :) > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>. Other dma-api backends like cma just shut up when __GFP_NOWARN is passed. And afaiui Christoph Hellwig has plans to nuke the DMA_ATTR stuff (or at least clean it up) - should we just remove DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN and instead only look at __GFP_NOWARN? For context the CMA patch: commit ef4650144e76ae361fe4b8c9a0afcd53074cd520 Author: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Oct 13 15:58:01 2017 -0700 mm/cma.c: take __GFP_NOWARN into account in cma_alloc() Or maybe we should at least enforce that both or none are set, for consistency for now? Cheers, Daniel > > Christian. > >> --- >> lib/swiotlb.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c >> index c43ec2271469..e9ac21540628 100644 >> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c >> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c >> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ swiotlb_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, >> dma_addr_t *dma_handle, >> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE, >> DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC); >> out_warn: >> - if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN) && printk_ratelimit()) { >> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN) && printk_ratelimit()) { >> dev_warn(dev, >> "swiotlb: coherent allocation failed, size=%zu\n", >> size); > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel