When this was introduced in
commit a519435a96597d8cd96123246fea4ae5a6c90b02
Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:34:16 2015 +0200
dma-buf/fence: add fence_wait_any_timeout function v2
there was a restriction added that this only works if the dma-fence
uses the dma_fence_default_wait hook. Which works for amdgpu, which is
the only caller. Well, until you share some buffers with e.g. i915,
then you get an -EINVAL.
But there's really no reason for this, because all drivers must
support callbacks. The special ->wait hook is only as an optimization;
if the driver needs to create a worker thread for an active callback,
then it can avoid to do that if it knows that there's a process
context available already. So ->wait is just an optimization, just
using the logic in dma_fence_default_wait() should work for all
drivers.
Let's remove this restriction.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7b5b40d6b70e..59049375bd19 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -503,11 +503,6 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
struct dma_fence *fence = fences[i];
- if (fence->ops->wait != dma_fence_default_wait) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto fence_rm_cb;
- }
-
cb[i].task = current;
if (dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &cb[i].base,
dma_fence_default_wait_cb)) {
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
