On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:06:49PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thursday, 19 April 2018 19:27:51 EEST Peter Rosin wrote: > > This makes this driver work with all(?) drivers that are not > > componentized and instead expect to connect to a panel/bridge. That > > said, the only one tested is atmel_hlcdc. > > > > This hooks the relevant work function previously called by the encoder > > and the component also to the bridge, since the encoder goes away when > > connecting to the bridge interface of the driver and the equivalent of > > bind/unbind of the component is handled by bridge attach/detach. > > > > The lifetime requirements of a bridge and a component are slightly > > different, which is the reason for struct tda998x_bridge. > > Couldn't you move the allocation and initialization (tda998x_create) of the > tda998x_priv structure to probe time ? I think you wouldn't need a separate > structure in that case. Unless I'm mistaken there would be an added benefit of > separating component and bridge initialization, resulting in the encoder not > being initialized at all if the component isn't used. You wouldn't need to add > a local_encoder parameter to the tda998x_init() function. No, I don't like that idea one bit, as I've stated in the past about the component API. The same (probably) goes for the bridge stuff too. Consider the following: Your DRM system is initialised. You then remove a module, which results in the DRM system being torn down. You re-insert the module (eg, having made a change to it). The DRM system is then re-initialised. At this point, what is the state of variables such as priv->is_on if you allocate the structure at probe time? What about all the other variables in the driver private structure - are you sure that the driver can cope with random values from the previous "usage" remaining there? At the moment, this isn't a concern for the driver because we dev_kzalloc() the structure in the bind callback. Move that to the probe function, and the structure is no longer re-initialised each time, and so it retains the previous state. The driver is not setup to cope with that. So, to work around that, you would need to reinitialise _everything_ in the structure that the driver requires, which IMHO is a very open to bugs (eg, if a member is missed, or added without the necessary re-initialisation), _especially_ when this is not a path that will get regular testing. If you want to do this for a subset of data, it would be much better to separate them into independent structures (maybe one embedded into the other) so that this problem can not occur. That way, a subset of the data can be memset() when bound to the rest of the DRM system ensuring a consistent driver state and still achieve what you're suggesting. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
