On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:01:46PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
> ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
> user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this aspect
> ratio information.
>
> To avoid this, a new drm client cap is required to enable a
> user-space to advertise if it supports modes with aspect-ratio. Based
> on this cap value, the kernel will take a call on exposing the aspect
> ratio info in modes or not.
>
> This patch adds the client cap for aspect-ratio.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> V3: rebase
> V4: As suggested by Marteen Lankhorst modified the commit message
> explaining the need to use the DRM cap for aspect-ratio. Also,
> tweaked the comment lines in the code for better understanding and
> clarity, as recommended by Shashank Sharma.
> V5: rebase
> V6: rebase
> V7: rebase
> V8: rebase
> V9: rebase
> V10: added comment explaining that no userspace breaks on aspect-ratio
> mode bits.
>
> Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/drm/drm_file.h | 8 ++++++++
> include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> index af78291..39c8eab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,15 @@ drm_setclientcap(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> file_priv->atomic = req->value;
> file_priv->universal_planes = req->value;
> break;
> + case DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ASPECT_RATIO:
> + if (req->value > 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * No Atomic userspace blows up on aspect ratio mode bits. Checked in
> + * wayland/weston, xserver, and hardware-composer modeset paths.
> + */
Bogus indentation.
Also where's the aspect_ratio_allowed handling for the atomic cap?
Or did we decide against it after all?
> + file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed = req->value;
> + break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> index 5176c37..02b7dde 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> @@ -182,6 +182,14 @@ struct drm_file {
> unsigned atomic:1;
>
> /**
> + * @aspect_ratio_allowed:
> + *
> + * True, if client can handle picture aspect ratios, and has requested
> + * to pass this information along with the mode.
> + */
> + unsigned aspect_ratio_allowed:1;
> +
> + /**
> * @is_master:
> *
> * This client is the creator of @master. Protected by struct
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> index 6fdff59..9c660e1 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> @@ -680,6 +680,13 @@ struct drm_get_cap {
> */
> #define DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ATOMIC 3
>
> +/**
> + * DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ASPECT_RATIO
> + *
> + * If set to 1, the DRM core will provide aspect ratio information in modes.
> + */
> +#define DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ASPECT_RATIO 4
> +
> /** DRM_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_CAP ioctl argument type */
> struct drm_set_client_cap {
> __u64 capability;
> --
> 2.7.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
