On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:59:59PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:49:43PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> From: Rob Clark <rob@xxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Update to reflect changes in: >> >> "Make the per-driver file_operations struct const" >> > >> > This one I could take today, no need for me to rely on the drm api >> > changes, right? >> >> I don't think so, at least not if you want it to compile ;-) > > Doh, you are right, sorry about that. > >> Previously the 'struct file_operations' was inline with the 'struct >> drm_driver' rather than a pointer. But if it it makes it easier for >> you to keep track I can keep a tree that you can pull from w/ a branch >> on top with the patches that depend on stuff coming in thru drm-next. > > No, that would mix the two branches, and I can't do that, right? hmm, yeah > So let's just wait for the drm-next branch to be merged with Linus, and > I'll hold onto these until then, ok? ok, great.. if you don't mind just holding them until drm-next gets pulled into Linus's tree, that would be perfect. Thanks! BR, -R > thanks, > > greg k-h > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
