On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/04/2018 11:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >>> >>> On 04/04/2018 10:43 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:22:21AM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On 04/04/2018 08:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Add an atomic helper to implement dirtyfb support. This is needed to >>>>>>> support DSI command-mode panels with x11 userspace (ie. when we can't >>>>>>> rely on pageflips to trigger a flush to the panel). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To signal to the driver that the async atomic update needs to >>>>>>> synchronize with fences, even though the fb didn't change, the >>>>>>> drm_atomic_state::dirty flag is added. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Background: there are a number of different folks working on getting >>>>>>> upstream kernel working on various different phones/tablets with qcom >>>>>>> SoC's.. many of them have command mode panels, so we kind of need a >>>>>>> way to support the legacy dirtyfb ioctl for x11 support. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know there is work on a proprer non-legacy atomic property for >>>>>>> userspace to communicate dirty-rect(s) to the kernel, so this can >>>>>>> be improved from triggering a full-frame flush once that is in >>>>>>> place. But we kinda needa a stop-gap solution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I had considered an in-driver solution for this, but things get a >>>>>>> bit tricky if userspace ands up combining dirtyfb ioctls with page- >>>>>>> flips, because we need to synchronize setting various CTL.FLUSH bits >>>>>>> with setting the CTL.START bit. (ie. really all we need to do for >>>>>>> cmd mode panels is bang CTL.START, but is this ends up racing with >>>>>>> pageflips setting FLUSH bits, then bad things.) The easiest soln >>>>>>> is to wrap this up as an atomic commit and rely on the worker to >>>>>>> serialize things. Hence adding an atomic dirtyfb helper. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess at least the helper, with some small addition to translate >>>>>>> and pass-thru the dirty rect(s) is useful to the final atomic dirty- >>>>>>> rect property solution. Depending on how far off that is, a stop- >>>>>>> gap solution could be useful. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adding Noralf, who iirc already posted the full dirty helpers already >>>>>> somewhere. >>>>>> -Daniel >>>>> >>>>> I've asked Deepak to RFC the core changes suggested for the full dirty >>>>> blob >>>>> on dri-devel. It builds on DisplayLink's suggestion, with a simple >>>>> helper to >>>>> get to the desired coordinates. >>>>> >>>>> One thing to perhaps discuss is how we would like to fit this with >>>>> front-buffer rendering and the dirty ioctl. In the page-flip context, >>>>> the >>>>> dirty rects, like egl's swapbuffer_with_damage is a hint to restrict >>>>> the >>>>> damage region that can be fully ignored by the driver, new content is >>>>> indicated by a new framebuffer. >>>>> >>>>> We could do the same for frontbuffer rendering: Either set a dirty flag >>>>> like >>>>> you do here, or provide a content_age state member. Since we clear the >>>>> dirty >>>>> flag on state copies, I guess that would be sufficient. The blob >>>>> rectangles >>>>> would then become a hint to restrict the damage region. >>>> >>>> I'm not entirely following here - I thought for frontbuffer rendering >>>> the >>>> dirty rects have always just been a hint, and that the driver was always >>>> free to re-upload the entire buffer to the screen. >>>> >>>> And through a helper like Rob's proposing here (and have floated around >>>> in >>>> different versions already) we'd essentially map a frontbuffer dirtyfb >>>> call to a fake flip with dirty rect. Manual upload drivers already need >>>> to >>>> upload the entire screen if they get a flip, since some userspace uses >>>> that to flush out frontbuffer rendering (instead of calling dirtyfb). >>>> >>>> So from that pov the new dirty flag is kinda not necessary imo. >>>> >>>>> Another approach would be to have the presence of dirty rects without >>>>> framebuffer change to indicate frontbuffer rendering. >>>>> >>>>> I think I like the first approach best, although it may be tempting for >>>>> user-space apps to just set the dirty bit instead of providing the full >>>>> damage region. >>>> >>>> Or I'm not following you here, because I don't quite see the difference >>>> between dirtyfb and a flip. >>>> -Daniel >>> >>> OK, let me rephrase: >>> >>> From the driver's point-of-view, in the atomic world, new content and >>> the >>> need for manual upload is indicated by a change in fb attached to the >>> plane. >>> >>> With Rob's patch here, (correct me if I'm wrong) in addition new content >>> and >>> the need for manual upload is identified by the dirty flag, (since the fb >>> stays the same and the driver thus never identifies a page-flip). >> >> Hm, I'm not entirely sure Rob's approach is correct. Imo a pageflip >> (atomic or not) should result in the entire buffer getting uploaded. The >> dirty flag is kinda redundant, a flip with the same buffer works the same >> way as a dirtyfb with the entire buffer as the dirty rectangle. >> >>> In both these situations, clip rects can provide a hint to restrict the >>> dirty region. >>> >>> Now I was thinking about the preferred way for user-space to communicate >>> front buffer rendering through the atomic ioctl: >>> >>> 1) Expose a dirty (or content_age property) >>> 2) Attach a clip-rect blob property. >>> 3) Fake a page-flip by ping-ponging two frame-buffers pointing to the >>> same >>> underlying buffer object. >>> >>> Are you saying that people are already using 3) and we should keep using >>> that? >> >> I'm saying they're using 3b), flip the same buffer wrapped in the same >> drm_framebuffer, and expect it to work. >> >> The only advantage dirtyfb has is that it allows you to supply the >> optimized upload rectangles, but at the cost of a funny api (it's working >> on the fb, not the plane/crtc you want to upload) and lack of drm_event to >> confirm when exactly you uploaded your stuff. But imo they should be the >> same underlying operation. >> > > FWIW, vmwgfx has always treated a dirtyfb as a pure front-buffer like > rendering operation without any synchronization, I guess this works for you because dirtyfb msg to host and rendering msgs to host end up serialized? > We've guaranteed that only the rects that are present are uploaded, but only > xf86-video-vmware has taken advantage of this to keep > CPU- and GPU rendered content apart. > I think we've at some point run into problems with number of cliprects, (Old > KDE lock screen?) and use multiple dirtyfb for the same > update... fwiw, I haven't really looked at how it works on msm yet.. my memories from omap where that we could set a single clip-rect on tx to panel but we'd need to block tx of contents of next clip-rect until previous was finished, so we kinda have a limit of 1.. and I expect msm (or most other dsi drivers) are similar.. but I'm expecting that serializing everything on atomic commit worker helps here BR, -R > > IIRC the reason for working with the fb, is that it's much easier for > user-space, which doesn't have to care where planes are scanning out and > why. > "Present my new content on any screen that's affected". > > /Thomas > > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
