[PATCH v6 28/30] drm/rockchip: Disable PSR from reboot notifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

It looks like the driver subsystem detaches devices from power domains
at shutdown without consent of the drivers. This means that we might have
our power domain turned off behind our back and the only way to avoid
problems is to stop doing any hardware programming at some point before
the power is cut. A reboot notifier, despite being a misnomer and
handling shutdowns as well, is a good place to do it.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c
index e7e16d92d5a1..1bf5cba9a64d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_psr.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/input.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
 
 #include <drm/drmP.h>
 #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ struct psr_drv {
 	struct delayed_work	flush_work;
 	struct work_struct	disable_work;
 
+	struct notifier_block	reboot_nb;
 	struct input_handler    input_handler;
 
 	int (*set)(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enable);
@@ -309,6 +311,24 @@ static const struct input_device_id psr_ids[] = {
 	{ },
 };
 
+static int rockchip_drm_psr_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+					    unsigned long action, void *data)
+{
+	struct psr_drv *psr = container_of(nb, struct psr_drv, reboot_nb);
+
+	/*
+	 * It looks like the driver subsystem detaches devices from power
+	 * domains at shutdown without consent of the drivers. This means
+	 * that we might have our power domain turned off behind our back
+	 * and the only way to avoid problems is to stop doing any hardware
+	 * programming after this point, which is achieved by the unbalanced
+	 * call below.
+	 */
+	rockchip_drm_psr_inhibit_get(psr->encoder);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * rockchip_drm_psr_register - register encoder to psr driver
  * @encoder: encoder that obtain the PSR function
@@ -361,6 +381,9 @@ int rockchip_drm_psr_register(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
 	if (error)
 		goto err1;
 
+	psr->reboot_nb.notifier_call = rockchip_drm_psr_reboot_notifier;
+	register_reboot_notifier(&psr->reboot_nb);
+
 	mutex_lock(&drm_drv->psr_list_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&psr->list, &drm_drv->psr_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&drm_drv->psr_list_lock);
@@ -403,6 +426,7 @@ void rockchip_drm_psr_unregister(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
 			WARN_ON(psr->inhibit_count != 1);
 
 			list_del(&psr->list);
+			unregister_reboot_notifier(&psr->reboot_nb);
 			input_unregister_handler(&psr->input_handler);
 			kfree(psr->input_handler.name);
 			kfree(psr);
-- 
2.16.3

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux