Re: [PATCH libdrm v2 14/23] meson: use simple option handling for omap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 2018-04-04 19:55:18 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:38:09PM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > -with_omap = false
> > -_omap = get_option('omap')
> > -if _omap == 'true'
> > -  if not with_atomics
> > -    error('libdrm_omap requires atomics.')
> > -  endif
> > -  with_omap = true
> > +with_exynos = false
> > +_exynos = get_option('exynos')
> > +if _exynos == 'auto'
> > +  with_exynos = true
> > +else
> > +  with_exynos = _exynos == 'true'
> >  endif
> 
> Looks like some patch rebasing went wrong with this one (it
> simplifies omap, but also adds some exynos stuff)?

Indeed, that's a complete rebase fail...
Thanks for not letting me push this unaware :)

I'll send a v3 of 8-19 next week, after landing the first bits (1-7).
I think I'll defer 20-23 to after everything else has landed.

> 
> -- Sebastian
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux