Hi, On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The A33 has a MIPI-DSI block, along with its D-PHY. Let's add it in order > > to use it in the relevant boards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi > > index 50eb84fa246a..94cfa7b1bbfa 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi > > @@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ > > #address-cells = <1>; > > #size-cells = <0>; > > reg = <1>; > > + > > + tcon0_out_dsi0: endpoint@1 { > > + reg = <1>; > > + remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_in_tcon0>; > > + }; > > }; > > }; > > }; > > @@ -280,6 +285,45 @@ > > #io-channel-cells = <0>; > > }; > > > > + dsi0: dsi@1ca0000 { > > Nit: There's only one so you don't need the numbered suffix. I'll fix it. > Also, is "dsi" specific enough, or should we use "mipi-dsi" If we were to be pedantic about it, that would even be MIPI-DSI2, but I'm not sure it's worth it to be honest. > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi"; > > + reg = <0x01ca0000 0x1000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MIPI_DSI>, > > + <&ccu CLK_DSI_SCLK>; > > + clock-names = "bus", "mod"; > > + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MIPI_DSI>; > > + phys = <&dphy0>; > > + phy-names = "dphy"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + > > + ports { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + port@0 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + reg = <0>; > > + > > + dsi0_in_tcon0: endpoint { > > + remote-endpoint = <&tcon0_out_dsi0>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + dphy0: d-phy@1ca1000 { > > Same nit, and "dsi-phy" would be better. D-PHY is one of the MIPI standards that can be used with DSI, but it doesn't mean DSI-PHY. You also have C-PHY (that can be used with DSI as well) and M-PHY (than can be used with UniPro and CSI3). So, no, it really is a D-PHY controller :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel