On 29 March 2018 at 12:17, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/28/18 16:35, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 28 March 2018 at 11:27, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 03/28/18 03:24, Emil Velikov wrote: > >>>> Gents, can someone double-check this please? Just in case. >>> >>> I guess I should test whether this series regresses the use case >>> described in c2cbc38b97; is that correct? >>> >> Precisely. > >> [3] https://github.com/evelikov/linux/commits/ioctl-cleanups > > Unfortunately, this series seems to reintroduce the regression fixed / > described earlier in commit c2cbc38b97. > Thank you very much for testing. Believe I've tracked it down to a broken commit from 2014 ;-) Please try the following branch [1] - it's untested, but I'm 99% sure it will work like a charm. If it doesn't please share the dmesg of a) the updated branch, and b) baseline + the debug patch [2] Thanks again! Emil [1] https://github.com/evelikov/linux/commits/ioctl-cleanups-v2 [2] https://github.com/evelikov/linux/commit/c2bc545d677001ffe5387aebb708d1adeb12b35b _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
