On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:55:50PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:54:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 10:53:24AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > > Modernize vga_switcheroo by using a device link to enforce a runtime PM > > > > > dependency from an HDA controller to the GPU it's integrated into, v2. > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/l1k/linux/commits/switcheroo_devlink_v2 > > > > > > Patches [3/7] to [7/7] were reviewed by Peter Wu, the HDA bits in > > > patch [5/7] additionally by Takashi. > > > > > > Patch [2/7] was acked by Bjorn. There was no ack for patch [1/7] > > > (authored by Rafael), but it adressed the objection Bjorn raised > > > against my original patch, so I'm assuming Bjorn is okay with it. > > > (Bjorn, please let me know if that isn't the case.) > > > > > > If there are no objections, I plan to push the series to > > > drm-misc-next by the middle of the coming week so that it > > > would still catch the last train to 4.17. > > > > Please make sure all maintainers of other bits are ok with that and have > > given their formal ack for merging through drm-misc. > > Oh, I had thought Bjorn's acks for patches [2/7] and [5/7] and > Takashi's reviewed-by for the HDA-related patches were sufficient. There's a huge confusion around acked-by "I think this looks reasonable", acked-by "this is reviewed but I don't feel like a full review tag" and acked-by "for merging through some other tree" and a few other meanings. Always good to double-check :-) -Daniel > > Bjorn, Takashi, any objections against merging this through drm-misc? > > Thanks, > > Lukas -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
