On 03/09/2018 03:35 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > 2018년 03월 08일 20:22에 Sylwester Nawrocki 이(가) 쓴 글: >> On 03/08/2018 09:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote: [...] >>> Is there a possibility for other boards based on Exynos4210/4212/5420/5433 >>> SoC to use this property later? >> >> All these SoCs have the HDMI IP block which has one input DAI, connected >> internally over I2S bus with the I2S controller. >> >> I think there is no advantage in limiting ourselves now only to SoC's >> for which we currently rely on that DT property in current kernel code, >> just to update this documentation later when we actually put the property >> in dts files. >> >> In case of exynos5420 we already require #sound-dai-cells for Odroid and > > Maybe exynos5422? Odroid XU3/4 use Exynos5422. Yes, my mistake, Exynos5422 for Odroid and Exynos5420 for Peach-Pit. It just happens we use "samsung,exynos5420-hdmi" compatible for that both SoCs. > Seems that '#sound-dai-cells' is required mandatorily in case of Exynos5422 > because Odroid XU3/4 Audio driver checks this property, and the driver > returns error if the property doesn't exist in its device tree. > And if other SoCs - Exynos4210/4212/5250/5420/5433 - require this property > with additional driver works later then this property would also be required > mandatorily for them not optionally. In this case we may need to modify the > description again. > > So my opinion is to add only the description required mandatorily if I > understood correctly. You are right, it would be better to make this a mandatory property, I only made it optional because now this property is missing in many dts files. Let me resend with #sound-dai-cells description moved to the "Required properties" paragraph. -- Thanks, Sylwester _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
