Re: [PATCH v4 02/38] drm/rockchip: Don't use atomic constructs for psr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, 5. März 2018, 23:22:54 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Instead of using timer and spinlocks, use delayed_work and
> mutexes for rockchip psr. This allows us to make blocking
> calls when enabling/disabling psr (which is sort of important
> given we're talking over dpcd to the display).
> 
> Cc: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 征增 王 <wzz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

applied to drm-misc-next after
checking on both pinky (rk3288) and kevin (rk3399).


Heiko
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux