Hi Chanwoo, Archit, On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> Hi Rob and Andrzej, >> >> On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof, >>> >>> >>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations. >>>> >>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with >>>> working example. >>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading >>>> to a happy end :) >>>> >>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function. >>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts. >>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C >>>> example. >>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks >>>> >>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Andrzej >>>> >>>> >>>> Andrzej Hajda (5): >>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector >>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector >>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms >>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector >>>> extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node >>>> >>>> Maciej Purski (1): >>>> drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL >>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's >>> acks for dts part). >>> Now I have a question how to merge them. >>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from >>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st. >>> I can merge it: >>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree. >>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via >>> samsung-soc tree. >>> >>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas? >> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1 >> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej. >> >> > I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request. > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib-extcon-drm-dt-v4.17 > > Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me. > It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch. Beside it I am OK with your immutable branch, Archit is it OK to do it this way in drm-misc? Regards Andrzej _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
