Hi Tomi, On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 13:37:48 EET Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 27/02/18 16:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > the whole omap_irq_fifo_underflow() and omap_irq_ocp_error_handler() IRQ > > handling to the DSS side, as they're not DRM/KMS-related ? > > I think we should react to both errors somehow (I'm not sure how, > disable output probably), and that has to be done on the KMS level. We > don't do that now, but moving this to DSS side would make error handling > more difficult to do in the future. Ideally I'd demultiplex interrupts on the DSS side and report events to the KMS side (page flip completion, underflows, ...). -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
