Am 28.02.2018 um 07:44 schrieb Monk Liu:
under below scenario the obj->fence would refer to a wild pointer:
1,call reservation_object_reserved_shared
2,call reservation_object_add_shared_fence
3,call reservation_object_reserved_shared
4,call reservation_object_add_shared_fence
in step 1, staged is allocated,
in step 2, code path will go reservation_object_add_shared_replace()
and obj->fence would be assigned as staged (through RCU_INIT_POINTER)
in step 3, obj->staged will be freed(by simple kfree),
which make obj->fence point to a wild pointer...
Well that explanation is still nonsense. See
reservation_object_add_shared_fence:
obj->staged = NULL;
Among the first things reservation_object_add_shared_fence() does is it
sets obj->staged to NULL.
So step 3 will not free anything and we never have a wild pointer.
Regards,
Christian.
in step 4, code path will go reservation_object_add_shared_inplace()
and inside it the @fobj (which equals to @obj->staged, set by above steps)
is already a wild pointer
should remov the kfree on staged in reservation_object_reserve_shared()
Change-Id: If7c01f1b4be3d3d8a81efa90216841f79ab1fc1c
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
index 375de41..b473ccc 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
@@ -74,12 +74,9 @@ int reservation_object_reserve_shared(struct reservation_object *obj)
old = reservation_object_get_list(obj);
if (old && old->shared_max) {
- if (old->shared_count < old->shared_max) {
- /* perform an in-place update */
- kfree(obj->staged);
- obj->staged = NULL;
+ if (old->shared_count < old->shared_max)
return 0;
- } else
+ else
max = old->shared_max * 2;
} else
max = 4;
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
