Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm assuming the correlation is done outside the vulkan driver? With a > clock_gettime() maybe? > > If that's the case, I'm afraid this will be highly inaccurate. > The kernel might execute other tasks when the ioctl() happens and that > might introduce (in my experience) a few milliseconds of delay. Yes, I agree. The trouble is that the window system layer works in one time base while the rendering layer works in the other, so there's no one driver which has access to both values, at least in Mesa. > I think if you want to do something like that, this has to be > implemented in the kernel, making sure you disable interruptions while > doing the correlation. That was my thinking originally, until I realized that there wasn't a single place which knew of the two clocks. Suggestions are welcome; I just don't know how the rendering driver is supposed to know what timebase the window system is running in? -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
