Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] cgroup: Allow drivers to store data associated with a cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:53:09AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
>  * Drivers may be built as modules (and unloaded/reloaded) which is not
>    something cgroup controllers support today.

As discussed in the other subthread, this shouldn't be a concern.

>  * Drivers may wish to provide their own interface to allow userspace to
>    adjust driver-specific settings (e.g., via a driver ioctl rather than
>    via the kernfs filesystem).
>  * A single driver may be managing multiple devices and wish to maintain
>    different driver-specific cgroup data for each.

If you look at io and rdma controllers, they already do this.

> Note that technically these interfaces aren't restricted to drivers
> (other non-driver parts of the kernel could make use of them as well).
> I expect drivers to be the primary consumers of this interface and
> couldn't think of a more appropriate generic name (the term "subsystem"
> would probably be more accurate, but that's already used by cgroup
> controllers).

Let's please not do "driver", it's really confusing.  Just coming up
with a made-up word would be fine as long as the connection can be
made and the word is easily identifiable.  e.g. cgroup cdata / pdata for
cgroup custom / priv data.

> +/*
> + * Driver-specific cgroup data.  Drivers should subclass this structure with
> + * their own fields for data that should be stored alongside individual
> + * cgroups.
> + */
> +struct cgroup_driver_data {
> +	/* Driver this data structure is associated with */
> +	struct cgroup_driver *drv;
> +
> +	/* Node in cgroup's data hashtable */
> +	struct hlist_node cgroupnode;
> +
> +	/* Node in driver's data list; used to cleanup on driver unload */
> +	struct list_head drivernode;
> +};
...
> +struct cgroup_driver {
> +	/* Functions this driver uses to manage its data */
> +	struct cgroup_driver_funcs *funcs;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * List of driver-specific data structures that need to be cleaned up
> +	 * if driver is unloaded.
> +	 */
> +	struct list_head datalist;
> +};

It generally looks great but can we do something like the following in
terms of interface?

  struct cgroup_cdata {
	  const void *key;
	  void (*free)(struct cgroup_cdata *cdata);
	  /* whatever other necessary fields */
	  char data[];
  };

  int cgroup_cdata_install(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_cdata *cdata);
  struct cgroup_cdata *cgroup_cdata_lookup(struct cgroup *cgrp, const void *key);
  int cgroup_cdata_free(struct cgroup *cgrp, const void *key);
  /* free is also automatically called when the cgroup is released */

And please use a separate lock or mutex for managing them.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux