[Bug 104888] DPMS issue w/ GFX8/Polaris10/Ellesmere/Rx-480-8GiB & agd5f's drm-next-4.17-wip

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Comment # 5 on bug 104888 from
(In reply to Harry Wentland from comment #3)
> Curiously enough this is the first time I've heard of setterm. I'm not sure
> if it's really supported but I tried amdgpu, non-amdgpu (i.e. vbios), and an
> Intel platform and on neither I can get setterm --powersafe on/off to do
> anything, no matter whether in a VT or in X (seems like it's intended for
> VT).
> 
> We do support "xset -display :0.0 dpms force off" when you're in X.

Huh, interesting.  I can't (yet) test 'xset -display :0.0 dpms force off',
since in still having issues bringing X/Wayland up, but that's a separate bug.

No useful output from amdgpu.dc_log=1 and drm.debug=4 set yet, but I'm trying
agd5f's latest push to drm-next-4.17-wip, which has a commit that looks like it
may contain a fix, so we'll see.


You are receiving this mail because:
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux