+Knut, Fengguang On Fri, 02 Feb 2018, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - If clang now builds the kernel "cleanly", yes, I want to take > warning fixes in the stable tree. And even better yet, if you > keep working to ensure the tree is "clean", that would be > wonderful. So we can run sparse using 'make C=1' and friends, or other static analysis tools using 'make CHECK=foo C=1', as long as the passed command line params work. There was work by Knut to extend this make checker stuff [1]. Since mixing different HOSTCC's in a single workdir seems like a bad idea, I wonder how hard it would be to make clang work like this: $ make CHECK=clang C=1 Or using Knut's wrapper. Feels like that could increase the use of clang for static analysis of patches. BR, Jani. [1] http://mid.mail-archive.com/cover.5b56d020b8e826a7da33b1823c059acd0c123f8b.1515072782.git-series.knut.omang@xxxxxxxxxx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
