Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14/2011 05:02 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Hellstrom<thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 11/11/2011 11:47 PM, j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
So attached is updated serie of patch with fixes for swaping issue
that also impacted memory accounting.
Jerome,
Out of interest, what was the swapping issue?

/Thomas


The page list was NULL and some access ended up freaking the kernel
and oom kicked in for some reason i still don't understand. Bottom
line things were going south in a split second leaving me with no log
or access, i thought it was accounting not working as it was what i
tested at the time. I should have tested accouting without the
patchset

Cheers,
Jerome

Still, I think you have a point in the fact that *when* finally the OOM killer kicks in, it probably doesn't have a way to associate user-space created bos with processes
and kill the right process.

/Thomas

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux