Re: [PATCH libdrm 4/7] tests/amdgpu: fix bad sign comparisons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 26.01.2018 um 18:15 schrieb Eric Engestrom:
On Friday, 2018-01-26 12:38:35 +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 26.01.2018 um 12:32 schrieb Eric Engestrom:
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c      |  2 +-
   tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c | 10 +++++-----
   tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c     | 10 +++++-----
   tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c     |  4 ++--
   4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c
index a5361cd59457d039dea9..40700f53d35f3340b895 100644
--- a/tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c
+++ b/tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_decode(void)
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
   	/* TODO: use a real CRC32 */
-	for (i = 0, sum = 0; i < dt_size; ++i)
+	for (uint64_t i = 0, sum = 0; i < dt_size; ++i)
Please keep the define local to the function,
I assume this applies to all the hunks in this patch, right?

Yeah, in general we try to follow kernel coding style rules with the libdrm amdgpu stuff.

I'll send a v2 later (ie. next week).

even worse this seems to shadow a local defined i.
It does shadow the function-wide `i`, because it's a different kind of
index. I guess really it should have a different name, but I don't know
enought about what this is all doing to think of a good name; any ideas?

Just make the function wide i uint64_t, that should work and nothing of that code is performance critical.

Christian.


Christian.

   		sum += ptr[i];
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(sum, SUM_DECODE);
diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c
index 0377c1a5d7e1b789d782..c1b840e3e56d83d0a3af 100644
--- a/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c
+++ b/tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static void check_result(struct amdgpu_uvd_enc *enc)
   	uint64_t sum;
   	uint32_t s = 175602;
   	uint32_t *ptr, size;
-	int j, r;
+	int r;
   	r = amdgpu_bo_cpu_map(enc->fb.handle, (void **)&enc->fb.ptr);
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static void check_result(struct amdgpu_uvd_enc *enc)
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
   	r = amdgpu_bo_cpu_map(enc->bs.handle, (void **)&enc->bs.ptr);
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
-	for (j = 0, sum = 0; j < size; ++j)
+	for (uint32_t j = 0, sum = 0; j < size; ++j)
   		sum += enc->bs.ptr[j];
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(sum, s);
   	r = amdgpu_bo_cpu_unmap(enc->bs.handle);
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_session_init(void)
   static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_encode(void)
   {
-	int len, r, i;
+	int len, r;
   	uint64_t luma_offset, chroma_offset;
   	uint32_t vbuf_size, bs_size = 0x003f4800, cpb_size;
   	unsigned align = (family_id >= AMDGPU_FAMILY_AI) ? 256 : 16;
@@ -354,11 +354,11 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_uvd_enc_encode(void)
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
   	memset(enc.vbuf.ptr, 0, vbuf_size);
-	for (i = 0; i < enc.height; ++i) {
+	for (unsigned i = 0; i < enc.height; ++i) {
   		memcpy(enc.vbuf.ptr, (frame + i * enc.width), enc.width);
   		enc.vbuf.ptr += ALIGN(enc.width, align);
   	}
-	for (i = 0; i < enc.height / 2; ++i) {
+	for (unsigned i = 0; i < enc.height / 2; ++i) {
   		memcpy(enc.vbuf.ptr, ((frame + enc.height * enc.width) + i * enc.width), enc.width);
   		enc.vbuf.ptr += ALIGN(enc.width, align);
   	}
diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c
index 75821bbb1e6c92e91fe7..6da6511793a1cf0ab488 100644
--- a/tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c
+++ b/tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ static void check_result(struct amdgpu_vce_encode *enc)
   {
   	uint64_t sum;
   	uint32_t s[2] = {180325, 15946};
-	uint32_t *ptr, size;
-	int i, j, r;
+	uint32_t *ptr, i, j, size;
+	int r;
   	for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
   		r = amdgpu_bo_cpu_map(enc->fb[i].handle, (void **)&enc->fb[i].ptr);
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_vce_encode(void)
   {
   	uint32_t vbuf_size, bs_size = 0x154000, cpb_size;
   	unsigned align = (family_id >= AMDGPU_FAMILY_AI) ? 256 : 16;
-	int i, r;
+	int r;
   	vbuf_size = ALIGN(enc.width, align) * ALIGN(enc.height, 16) * 1.5;
   	cpb_size = vbuf_size * 10;
@@ -472,11 +472,11 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_vce_encode(void)
   	CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
   	memset(enc.vbuf.ptr, 0, vbuf_size);
-	for (i = 0; i < enc.height; ++i) {
+	for (unsigned i = 0; i < enc.height; ++i) {
   		memcpy(enc.vbuf.ptr, (frame + i * enc.width), enc.width);
   		enc.vbuf.ptr += ALIGN(enc.width, align);
   	}
-	for (i = 0; i < enc.height / 2; ++i) {
+	for (unsigned i = 0; i < enc.height / 2; ++i) {
   		memcpy(enc.vbuf.ptr, ((frame + enc.height * enc.width) + i * enc.width), enc.width);
   		enc.vbuf.ptr += ALIGN(enc.width, align);
   	}
diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c
index 2eb8c4347be094a70958..b228db609f0e0c0fefdd 100644
--- a/tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c
+++ b/tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void free_resource(struct amdgpu_vcn_bo *vcn_bo)
   	memset(vcn_bo, 0, sizeof(*vcn_bo));
   }
-static void vcn_dec_cmd(uint64_t addr, unsigned cmd, int *idx)
+static void vcn_dec_cmd(uint64_t addr, unsigned cmd, unsigned *idx)
   {
   	ib_cpu[(*idx)++] = 0x81C4;
   	ib_cpu[(*idx)++] = addr;
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_vcn_dec_decode(void)
   	const unsigned dpb_size = 15923584, dt_size = 737280;
   	uint64_t msg_addr, fb_addr, bs_addr, dpb_addr, ctx_addr, dt_addr, it_addr, sum;
   	struct amdgpu_vcn_bo dec_buf;
-	int size, len, i, r;
+	unsigned size, len, i, r;
   	uint8_t *dec;
   	size = 4*1024; /* msg */

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux