On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 09:17:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Ayan,
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:47:44PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:28:33PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:29:58PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 9 January 2018 12:56:20 EET Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > There's a bunch of drivers that duplicate the same function to know if a
> > > > > particular format embeds an alpha component or not.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's create a helper to avoid duplicating that logic.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Mark Yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > include/drm/drm_fourcc.h | 1 +-
> > > > > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c
> > > > > index 9c0152df45ad..6e6227d6a46b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fourcc.c
> > > > > @@ -348,3 +348,46 @@ int drm_format_plane_height(int height, uint32_t
> > > > > format, int plane) return height / info->vsub;
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_format_plane_height);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * drm_format_has_alpha - get whether the format embeds an alpha component
> > > > > + * @format: pixel format (DRM_FORMAT_*)
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Returns:
> > > > > + * true if the format embeds an alpha component, false otherwise.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +bool drm_format_has_alpha(uint32_t format)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + switch (format) {
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB4444:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR4444:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGBA4444:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGRA4444:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB1555:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR1555:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGBA5551:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGRA5551:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGBA8888:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGRA8888:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR2101010:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGBA1010102:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGRA1010102:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_AYUV:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGBX8888_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGRX8888_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGB888_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGR888_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565_A8:
> > > > > + case DRM_FORMAT_BGR565_A8:
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + default:
> > > > > + return false;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_format_has_alpha);
> > > >
> > > > How about adding the information to struct drm_format_info instead ?
> > > > drm_format_has_alpha() could then be implemented as
> > > >
> > > > bool drm_format_has_alpha(uint32_t format)
> > > > {
> > > > const struct drm_format_info *info;
> > > >
> > > > info = drm_format_info(format);
> > > > return info ? info->has_alpha : false;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > I considered it, and wasn't too sure about if adding more fields to
> > > drm_format_info was ok. I can definitely do it that way.
> >
> > Are you going to send an updated patch with the change mentioned here.
> > Or should I update my patch (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10161023/)
> > and change the type of '.alpha' to boolean to denote if the color
> > format has an alpha channel or not.
>
> Yes, I already had those patches ready. I'm just waiting for the
> discussion on the alpha property to settle before sending a v2.
>
Thanks for your response. I will hold on my changes
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10161339/) as it depends on your patch.
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
