On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:57:03PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > drm_vblank_count() has a u32 type returning what is a 64-bit vblank count. > The effect of this is when drm_wait_vblank_ioctl() tries to widen the user > space requested vblank sequence using this clipped 32-bit count(when the > value is >= 2^32) as reference, the requested sequence remains a 32-bit > value and gets queued like that. However, the code that checks if the > requested sequence has passed compares this against the 64-bit vblank > count. > > Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> Sounds like the 64bit widening wasn't all that well tested ... do we have an igt for this? Iirc the base igt was merged already. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > index 32d9bcf5be7f..768a8e44d99b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe, > store_vblank(dev, pipe, diff, t_vblank, cur_vblank); > } > > -static u32 drm_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe) > +static u64 drm_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe) > { > struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe]; > > -- > 2.11.0 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel