Hi Christophe ，
On 2018/1/4 16:05, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>
>
> Le 25/12/2017 à 02:34, Yisheng Xie a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 2017/12/24 17:05, christophe leroy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 23/12/2017 à 14:48, Greg KH a écrit :
>>>> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 06:55:25PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> When I tried to use devm_ioremap function and review related code, I found
>>>>> devm_ioremap and devm_ioremap_nocache is almost the same with each other,
>>>>> except one use ioremap while the other use ioremap_nocache.
>>>>
>>>> For all arches? Really? Look at MIPS, and x86, they have different
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>>> While ioremap's
>>>>> default function is ioremap_nocache, so devm_ioremap_nocache also have the
>>>>> same function with devm_ioremap, which can just be killed to reduce the size
>>>>> of devres.o(from 20304 bytes to 18992 bytes in my compile environment).
>>>>>
>>>>> I have posted two versions, which use macro instead of function for
>>>>> devm_ioremap_nocache[1] or devm_ioremap[2]. And Greg suggest me to kill
>>>>> devm_ioremap_nocache for no need to keep a macro around for the duplicate
>>>>> thing. So here comes v3 and please help to review.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this can be done, what am I missing? These functions are
>>>> not identical, sorry for missing that before.
>>>
>>> devm_ioremap() and devm_ioremap_nocache() are quite similar, both use devm_ioremap_release() for the release, why not just defining:
>>>
>>> static void __iomem *__devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>>> resource_size_t size, bool nocache)
>>> {
>>> [...]
>>> if (nocache)
>>> addr = ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
>>> else
>>> addr = ioremap(offset, size);
>>> [...]
>>> }
>>>
>>> then in include/linux/io.h
>>>
>>> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>>> resource_size_t size)
>>> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, false);}
>>>
>>> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_nocache(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>>> resource_size_t size);
>>> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, true);}
>>
>> Yeah, this seems good to me, right now we have devm_ioremap, devm_ioremap_wc, devm_ioremap_nocache
>> May be we can use an enum like:
>> typedef enum {
>> DEVM_IOREMAP = 0,
>> DEVM_IOREMAP_NOCACHE,
>> DEVM_IOREMAP_WC,
>> } devm_ioremap_type;
>>
>> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>> resource_size_t size)
>> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, DEVM_IOREMAP);}
>>
>> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_nocache(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>> resource_size_t size);
>> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, DEVM_IOREMAP_NOCACHE);}
>>
>> static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_wc(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>> resource_size_t size);
>> {return __devm_ioremap(dev, offset, size, DEVM_IOREMAP_WC);}
>>
>> static void __iomem *__devm_ioremap(struct device *dev, resource_size_t offset,
>> resource_size_t size, devm_ioremap_type type)
>> {
>> void __iomem **ptr, *addr = NULL;
>> [...]
>> switch (type){
>> case DEVM_IOREMAP:
>> addr = ioremap(offset, size);
>> break;
>> case DEVM_IOREMAP_NOCACHE:
>> addr = ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
>> break;
>> case DEVM_IOREMAP_WC:
>> addr = ioremap_wc(offset, size);
>> break;
>> }
>> [...]
>> }
>
>
> That looks good to me, will you submit a v4 ?
Sorry for late response. And I will submit the v4 as your suggestion.
Thanks
Yisheng
>
> Christophe
>
>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
