Re: [PATCH] radeon: completely remove lut leftovers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-01-10 09:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This is an oversight from
> 
> commit 42585395ebc1034a98937702849669f17eadb35f
> Author: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Jul 13 18:25:36 2017 +0200
> 
>     drm: radeon: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
> 
> Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 6 ------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h    | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
> index dfda5e0ed166..d22f4b6a8828 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
> @@ -698,12 +698,6 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
>  	radeon_crtc->mode_set.num_connectors = 0;
>  #endif
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
> -		radeon_crtc->lut_r[i] = i << 2;
> -		radeon_crtc->lut_g[i] = i << 2;
> -		radeon_crtc->lut_b[i] = i << 2;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (rdev->is_atom_bios && (ASIC_IS_AVIVO(rdev) || radeon_r4xx_atom))
>  		radeon_atombios_init_crtc(dev, radeon_crtc);
>  	else
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h
> index 3243e5e01432..5f61facafe36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h
> @@ -328,7 +328,6 @@ enum radeon_flip_status {
>  struct radeon_crtc {
>  	struct drm_crtc base;
>  	int crtc_id;
> -	u16 lut_r[256], lut_g[256], lut_b[256];
>  	bool enabled;
>  	bool can_tile;
>  	bool cursor_out_of_bounds;
> 

I posted a more complete patch (also removing the now unused local i)
for this in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-December/161116.html
. I'd like to only apply this once the problem discussed in that thread
is fixed though, but unfortunately the other patch I attached there
doesn't seem to fix it. What's the current plan for fixing this issue?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux