Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: enable eviction for Per-VM-BO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 15.12.2017 um 07:24 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
Hi.

On 12/14/2017 09:10 AM, Roger He wrote:
Change-Id: I0c6ece0decd18d30ccc94e5c7ca106d351941c62
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 11 +++++------
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 098b22e..ba5b486 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -707,7 +707,6 @@ bool ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
    static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
-                   struct reservation_object *resv,
                     uint32_t mem_type,
                     const struct ttm_place *place,
                     struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
@@ -722,8 +721,9 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
      spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
      for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
          list_for_each_entry(bo, &man->lru[i], lru) {
-            if (bo->resv == resv) {
-                if (list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))
+            if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
+                if (!ctx->allow_reserved_eviction &&
+                    list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))
                      continue;

It looks to me like a value of locked==true could leak through from a previous loop iteration here, so that locked ends up to be true if (bo->resv == resv  && ctx->allow_reserved_eviction), even if no locking was taking place. Perhaps-re-initialize locked to false on each loop iteration?

Yeah, that is correct. Roger had a patch for this as prerequisite for this one.

No idea why this change isn't obvious in this one.

Christian.


/Thomas

              } else {
                  locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
              return ret;
          if (mem->mm_node)
              break;
-        ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, bo->resv, mem_type, place, ctx);
+        ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type, place, ctx);
          if (unlikely(ret != 0))
              return ret;
      } while (1);
@@ -1332,8 +1332,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_force_list_clean(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
      for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
          while (!list_empty(&man->lru[i])) {
              spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-            ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, NULL, mem_type,
-                          NULL, &ctx);
+            ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type, NULL, &ctx);
              if (ret)
                  return ret;
              spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux