Hi,
On 13-12-2017 11:05, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 13/12/17 11:30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:48:47PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> When I connected my cubieboard running 4.15-rc1 to my 4k display I got no picture. Some
>>> digging found that there is no check against the upper pixelclock limit of the HDMI
>>> output, so X selects a 4kp60 format at 594 MHz, which obviously won't work.
>>>
>>> The patch below adds a check for the upper bound of what this hardware can do, and
>>> it checks if the requested tmds clock can be obtained.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c
>>> index dda904ec0534..c10400a19b33 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c
>>> @@ -208,8 +208,27 @@ static int sun4i_hdmi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int sun4i_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>>> +{
>>> + struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi = drm_connector_to_sun4i_hdmi(connector);
>>> + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000;
>>> + long rounded_rate;
>>> +
>>> + /* 165 MHz is the typical max pixelclock frequency for HDMI <= 1.2 */
>>> + if (rate > 165000000)
>>> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>> + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(hdmi->tmds_clk, rate);
>>> + if (rounded_rate < rate)
>>> + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
>>> + if (rounded_rate > rate)
>>> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>> + return MODE_OK;
>>> +}
>> This looks much better, thanks!
>>
>> One thing that I was mentionning in my other mail is that our rate
>> rounding might not provide the exact TMDS clock rate advertised by the
>> EDID, while staying in the tolerancy.
>>
>> We've raised this issue before, without coming to a conclusion. Would
>> you happen to know what that tolerancy would be on an HDMI link?
> I can't actually find anything about that in the HDMI spec. However, the VESA DMT
> spec specifies a tolerance of +/- 0.5% for the pixelclock.
>
> The HDMI 2.1 spec also suggests that this is the tolerance (caveat: I have not had
> the time to study this in detail, but it does mention it when describing the new
> variable refresh rate feature).
>
> That said, the problem with a 0.5% tolerance is that the slight slowdown for 59.94
> vs 60 Hz framerate falls within that tolerance (it's a 0.1% slowdown).
>
> Generally clocks will be able to hit the standard frequencies (74.25, 148.5, etc)
> exactly, but if you want to slow down for 59.94 framerate they tend to be off by
> a bit.
>
> In the end I think keeping a margin of 0.4 or 0.5% is the best approach.
We had the same problem in arcpgu, please check if commit [1] can
be used by you.
Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=22d0be2a557e53a22feb484e8fce255fe09e6ad5
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedesktop.org_mailman_listinfo_dri-2Ddevel&d=DwIGaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=yaVFU4TjGY0gVF8El1uKcisy6TPsyCl9uN7Wsis-qhY&m=HwJwBnLWatgtXZ6tmlyN-ibL-Cj4hheMGPCEW6rh7sY&s=0f011r4qaTVGDQc5-niD-Faj5yc2kl6jq2KtxKdU20o&e=
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
