Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v14 2/3] drm/tinydrm: Move tinydrm_of_find_backlight to backlight.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/12/17 10:43, Meghana Madhyastha wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 06:45:34PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote:

Den 24.10.2017 17.42, skrev Sean Paul:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 05:27:33PM +0530, Meghana Madhyastha wrote:
Rename tinydrm_of_find_backlight to of_find_backlight and move
it to linux/backlight.c so that it can be used by other drivers.

Signed-off-by: Meghana Madhyastha <meghana.madhyastha@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v14:
  -s/backlight_get/of_find_backlight/

  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-helpers.c | 40 --------------------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c             |  3 +-
  drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c            | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/drm/tinydrm/tinydrm-helpers.h          |  2 --
  include/linux/backlight.h                      | 19 ++++++++++++
  5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-helpers.c
index a42dee6..cb1a01a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-helpers.c
@@ -236,46 +236,6 @@ void tinydrm_xrgb8888_to_gray8(u8 *dst, void *vaddr, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(tinydrm_xrgb8888_to_gray8);
-/**
- * tinydrm_of_find_backlight - Find backlight device in device-tree
- * @dev: Device
- *
- * This function looks for a DT node pointed to by a property named 'backlight'
- * and uses of_find_backlight_by_node() to get the backlight device.
- * Additionally if the brightness property is zero, it is set to
- * max_brightness.
- *
- * Returns:
- * NULL if there's no backlight property.
- * Error pointer -EPROBE_DEFER if the DT node is found, but no backlight device
- * is found.
- * If the backlight device is found, a pointer to the structure is returned.
- */
-struct backlight_device *tinydrm_of_find_backlight(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct backlight_device *backlight;
-	struct device_node *np;
-
-	np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "backlight", 0);
-	if (!np)
-		return NULL;
-
-	backlight = of_find_backlight_by_node(np);
-	of_node_put(np);
-
-	if (!backlight)
-		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
-
-	if (!backlight->props.brightness) {
-		backlight->props.brightness = backlight->props.max_brightness;
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Backlight brightness set to %d\n",
-			      backlight->props.brightness);
-	}
-
-	return backlight;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(tinydrm_of_find_backlight);
-
  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI)
  /**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c
index 7fd2691..53ab5a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  #include <drm/tinydrm/ili9341.h>
  #include <drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.h>
  #include <drm/tinydrm/tinydrm-helpers.h>
+#include <linux/backlight.h>
  #include <linux/delay.h>
  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -188,7 +189,7 @@ static int mi0283qt_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
  	if (IS_ERR(mipi->regulator))
  		return PTR_ERR(mipi->regulator);
-	mipi->backlight = tinydrm_of_find_backlight(dev);
+	mipi->backlight = of_find_backlight(dev);
Sorry for the follow-up spam, but are you missing the put_device somewhere? The
next patch uses devm_of_find_backlight. So AFAICT you're either leaking a reference
here, or you're closing an additional reference in the next patch.

This is my fault, put_device() has been missing all along, so Meghana is
plugging that hole,
in the next patch :-)

Noralf.

Is there anything else that needs to be done for this patch ? If not,
and it is ready, can this be acked ? It seems to have been stuck for
some time now and I will definitely fix anything that needs to be fixed
in this patch ASAP.

I've lost track a little but have two questions:

1. Is there any pending feedback? If not a resend might be sensible.

2. Which maintainers are you expecting to pick up the patch? It looks to
   me like lots of people are be missing from the To: fields (compared
   to what I think get_maintainer.pl would give you) meaning the patches
   won't get picked up.


Daniel.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux